Current Issue
About Us
Submissions
Members
Archive
Forthcoming
Contact Us
Search

A Few Thoughts on Electronic Discovery After December 1, 2006 Print E-mail

ImageEditor's Note: On December 1, 2006, electronic discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure go into effect. In this seven-part series, Judge Lee H. Rosenthal, chair of the Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, offers an introduction to the new amendments and describes challenges they present for lawyers, litigants, and judges.

The last time the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to acknowledge computers was 1970, when the words “data and data compilations” were added to Rule 34. Thirty-six years later, long after the computer has become both ubiquitous and essential, it is time to do much more. On December 1, amendments will go into effect to make the discovery rules better able to accommodate the vast changes in information technology that have already occurred and that will inevitably continue.

The need for the guidance the e-discovery rule amendments provide is reflected in the fact that courts have been applying the new rules since they were proposed, years before their effective date. Because the amendments have to be flexible enough to apply to all federal cases that could involve electronic discovery and general enough to accommodate the inevitable changes in information technology, there are a number of issues the new rules do not address. Instead, the rules present procedures and guidelines targeted at the distinctive features of electronically stored information, to help resolve those issues when they arise. In this seven-part series, I discuss a few issues likely to arise under the new rules and the challenges they may present, not only for lawyers and litigants, but for judges.

[ Full Text (PDF) ]


 
Most Recent
Joaquin G. Avila, Renewing the Promise of Ending Voting Discrimination: A Return to an Effective Section 5 Retrogression Standard
Nathaniel Persily, The Constitutional Relevance of Alleged Legislative Dysfunction
David L. Epstein & Sharyn O’Halloran, The Paradox of Retrogression in the New VRA: Comment on Persily
The Pocket Part, Summer Submissions Announcement
Alan R. Levy, How “Swingers” Might Save Hollywood from a Federal Pornography Statute
Paul M. Thompson, First, Do No Harm: Why a Commissioner for Standards Is Unhealthy for the American Body Politic
Josh Chafetz, Curing Congress’s Ills: Criminal Law as the Wrong Paradigm for Congressional Ethics
The Pocket Part, Call For Papers: Virtual Worlds Symposium
The Pocket Part, Call for Papers: Symposium on Sovereign Wealth Funds
Kamal Ghali, A Procedural Rule and a Substantive Problem: Legislative Hawks and the Concentration of Power in Georgia’s Speaker of the House
Most Popular
Lee H. Rosenthal, An Overview of the E-Discovery Rules Amendments
Brian Leiter, Why Blogs Are Bad for Legal Scholarship
Andrew P. Thomas, The CSI Effect: Fact or Fiction
Jack M. Balkin, Online Legal Scholarship: The Medium and the Message
The Pocket Part, The Future of Legal Scholarship
Newsletter Signup
Sign up here to receive our monthly mailings:
TPP Newsletter
YLJ eTOC



Syndicate
Search

© 2008 The Yale Law Journal Company. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement